From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sun Jul 12 08:56:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CA8999BE9 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:56:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 051DF14ED for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:56:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@gmail.com) Received: by igpy18 with SMTP id y18so38994360igp.0 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 01:56:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=hHsxtlbYoWMTswvyOL0/FN79vp86YA1m+68M06T+BvQ=; b=jw/D7cUXJ1LDN3dFR9XGK5IKQwMNtkMZAPWyKQ8CuMYmA4CFnfuobfn2gr5Pms/MZb 08rntSvzxokMlGv4pc7SKBhAUB+5pEUGHURX6qKUAxuGZm+Ko8wOitr97uyurXBBelvB HI+FtSZyomJBjIuCNGWVbKlYRctrqXJvzIjSItPihMRytuzJxqd3w9Oljto+is4k0ymj Z281g/MHDX9udRLZJyN9IQXZ7hTs3n7czfUd9QTMZJtBDw8AJDy+58nuT642umUm9OP7 Pe3QV404xzUuDy9zTA1nv13hFZVJP3Y6C2gAIqZTQtAEF0sKVwmZU+4HcPPs4PX8OWiK 8bNw== X-Received: by 10.50.109.138 with SMTP id hs10mr6404098igb.48.1436691397378; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 01:56:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20150710235810.GA76134@rwpc16.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> <20150712032256.GB19305@satori.lan> <20150712050443.GA22240@server.rulingia.com> <20150712154416.b9f3713893fe28bfab1dd4d7@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20150712154416.b9f3713893fe28bfab1dd4d7@dec.sakura.ne.jp> From: Xin LI Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:56:26 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will 10.2 also ship with a very stale NTP? To: Tomoaki AOKI , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:56:38 -0000 I've spent some time on the MFC, the testing would still take some time (likely a day or two) and once that's finished I'll ask re@ for approval. On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:44 PM Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > As I already mentioned in another post, head has 4.2.8 p3 in-tree. > > So the answer should be MFC before creation of releng/10.2 is planned > or not. > > > On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:04:43 +1000 > Peter Jeremy wrote: > > > On 2015-Jul-11 23:22:56 -0400, Chris Nehren < > cnehren+freebsd-stable@pobox.com> wrote: > > >On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 09:58:11 +1000, John Marshall wrote: > > >> It's me again with my annual NTP whinge. > > > > > >The answer to the perennial "will release $foo ship with old / insecure > > >/ otherwise deficient $bar?" is still "install $bar from ports". > > > > That's a non-answer. It just changes the question to "why bother to > > include $bar in base when I need to install the port anyway". > > > > -- > > Peter Jeremy > > > -- > Tomoaki AOKI junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >