From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 26 19:31:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: multimedia@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE42616A407; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:31:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B5113C4A6; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:31:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1QJV3Ha019094 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:31:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l1QJV32j019093; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:31:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: "Michael Johnson" Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:31:02 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200702260942.27062@aldan> <200702261300.37063@aldan> In-Reply-To: X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org, mezz@freebsd.org Subject: Re: improving vlc-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:31:04 -0000 On Monday 26 February 2007 13:32, Michael Johnson wrote: = Yeah, you're right there. but I still don't understand why changing 2 lines = instead of just 1 is important. Give me a better example in why you think = this is so important =) Here is the general example: . User builds port X, which lib-depends on port Y; . User updates the ports tree and wishes to build port Z, which also lib-depends on Y; . Your way, this means, she/he has to rebuild port X too -- my way, rebuild of port X is not necessary. If changes in libx264 break things too often -- well, that may be a good reason to explicitly specify the major number fo libx264. Fine. But the port lib-depends on a dozen other ports, ALL of them with an explicit version specified. Are ALL of them breaking things? Probably not... Jeremy Messenger wrote: = "Values such as intl.[5-7] and intl are allowed." Yes, they are. Thanks for confirming. = We have chosen to use foobar.[0-9], we are maintaining for this port and = we like it. So.. I am not going to change it. Your choosing the "because I said so" argument is rather unfortunate and detrimental to your credibility... -mi