From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jan 31 12:45:20 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA18815 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sun, 31 Jan 1999 12:45:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from insomnia.local.net (arc1-69.netwalk.net [206.175.61.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA18806 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 1999 12:45:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmutter@netwalk.com) Received: from localhost (jmutter@localhost) by insomnia.local.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA01599 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 1999 15:46:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jmutter@netwalk.com) X-Authentication-Warning: insomnia.local.net: jmutter owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 15:46:24 -0500 (EST) From: "James A. Mutter" Reply-To: jm7996@devrycols.edu To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: pcm wierdness - or maybe not. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've got a simple questions regarding the pcm driver. I've built a kernel and included the pcm0 driver, no problems there. However, after the new kernel is installed and the machine restarted dmesg reports finding pcm1, but reports that it couldn't find pcm0. If I build with pcm1, it reports finding pcm2 and not pcm1. I'm just curious, is this normal? It's not a problem since everything actually works fine, I just really want to know why this happens! Thanks much, Jim - - Failure isn't getting knocked down - Failure is not getting back up. - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message