From owner-freebsd-libh Thu Sep 26 15:37: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204E237B401 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 15:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (fump.kawo2.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.181.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346EB43E3B for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 15:37:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alex@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de) Received: from fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g8QMcHu6050109; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:38:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from alex@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de) Received: (from alex@localhost) by fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g8QMcE3r050108; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:38:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:38:14 +0200 From: Alexander Langer To: Antoine Beaupre Cc: Alexander Langer , freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Package versionning (was: cvs commit: libh/lib/sysinstall Feature.cc) Message-ID: <20020926223814.GF47655@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> References: <20020926155153.GC47655@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Fingerprint: 7EC1 5B98 4554 2A63 9079 2B2F 9A94 CD6F 7F14 EFA4 X-PGP-at: finger alex@big.endian.de X-Verwirrung: Dieser Header dient der allgemeinen Verwirrung. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Antoine Beaupre (anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx): > Also, if the regular version is purely advisory, people are going to be > *really* confused when they'll see that > ls-1.1 > ls-1.2 People also will be confused if they expect to see a package xv-3.10a installed, but can't find them, just because we forbid letters... That's what I wanted to circumvent. > than the rule: "don't use it unless you have to. You *can* rely on > version checking or snapshot date, in some cases. But only in desperate > cases should you fall back to using serial numbers". sounds good. > There are regression tests in bin/regression. Are they still passed? Not tested. Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message