Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:49:35 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 204577] [NEW MODULE] Mk/Uses/nodejs.mk Framework for NodeJS projects/ports
Message-ID:  <bug-204577-13-kEerpBJYu8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-204577-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-204577-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204577

--- Comment #23 from yuri@rawbw.com ---
> I understand your approach, but there are also ports depending on single small libs. deskutils/ladon for example could be unbroken when having async, glob, mkdirp and yargs in tree.

> While large apps are great for end-users we should not forget there is a growing number of tools which npm-dependencies.

Ports can be created for the smaller packages too. I mostly meant that large
package shouldn't be split into hundreds of small dependencies from ports, like
this is done with C/C++ projects.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-204577-13-kEerpBJYu8>