From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 22 22:49:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC901ED6 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 22:49:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nbari@inbox.im) Received: from eu.route.mx (eu.route.mx [46.137.95.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2342A2F4 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 22:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (route-mx 45610 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2013 22:49:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nbari-z200.diz.la) (nbari@inbox.im@[194.65.5.235]) (envelope-sender ) by eu.route.mx (route-mx) with SMTP for ; 22 Mar 2013 22:49:40 -0000 Message-ID: <514CE002.8030408@inbox.im> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 22:49:38 +0000 From: Nicolas de Bari Embriz Garcia Rojas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130314 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: References: <1UJAVb-000I81-FX@internal.tormail.org> In-Reply-To: <1UJAVb-000I81-FX@internal.tormail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 22:49:48 -0000 Guys, please don't take me bad, but better stop this "@%!" and use your talent to help me found a way to properly measure bandwidth per jails in a long period. I am using sysutils/jail2 port to start/stop jails, My working configuration so far is this: I use the jid so that later I can use in /etc/rctl.conf with something like: jail:30:maxproc:deny=100 jail:30:memoryuse:deny=512M jail:30:swapuse:deny=1G my jail.conf looks like 8<---------- * { exec.start = "/bin/sh /etc/rc"; exec.stop = "/bin/sh /etc/rc.shutdown"; exec.clean; mount.devfs; allow.raw_sockets; securelevel = 3; } www { jid = 10; name = www; host.hostname = $name.localbox.org; ip4.addr = 174.143.193.60; path = /jails/www; mount.fstab="/etc/fstab.$name"; } vpn { jid = 20; name = vpn; host.hostname = $name.localbox.org; ip4.addr = 174.143.193.57, 10.216.28.77; path = /jails/vpn; mount.fstab="/etc/fstab.$name"; } guest { jid = 30; name = guest; host.hostname = $name.localbox.org; ip4.addr = 174.143.193.61; path = /jails/guest; mount.fstab="/etc/fstab.$name"; } 8<---------- On 03/22/2013 22:32, sib@tormail.org wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: >> Boy this simple critique request sure has gotten out of hand. So lets > set the record straight. > > You got exactly what you asked for. > >> On the subject ezjail not being referenced in the document like it is in > the current version of the online handbook is just a writing content > error. > > With all the spam you've put on the forums and mailing list(s) about > qjail, I wonder how true it is that you just "whoops, forgot to mention > ezjail" in your propaganda rewrite. > >> When it comes to the question of the handbook jail chapter needing >> updating, A member of the document team has already offered to partner up >> with me to get it added to the handbook as fast as possible. > The documentation team will never accept such poorly-written stuff that's > laced with "use qjail use qjail use qjail - it's the only way!" I'll > believe it when I see it. > >> On the subject of qjail being a fork of ezjail, of course it is. > Forks don't completely overwrite the copyright of a project and claim it > as their own, while just changing variable names and renaming the tool > something else. This is not a fork, it's a complete rip-off that gives no > credit to the original author (who did MUCH more of the work). > >> Qjail was developed by the qjail project team > No it wasn't. It was developed by the ezjail author, and you just made > small changes and called it your own. > >> Our British member concluded that the author of ezjail must be British > based solely on the spelling of the flavour directory. He also convinced > us that his Beerware license was British humor, a joke, and should not be > taken serous. > > I think the GPL is a joke, but people still take it seriously. You can't > just decide a license should be completely ignored. > >> I was chosen the project leader and public voice only because my English > was the best among us. > > It gives me a headache trying to read some of the stuff you write. You've > got an American guy and a British guy and neither of their native English > is better than yours? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"