Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 17 Jul 1999 08:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Duncan Barclay <dmlb@ragnet.demon.co.uk>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, crypt0genic <crypt0genic@ecad.org>, Bill Paul <wpaul@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu>, Vincent Poy <vince@venus.GAIANET.NET>
Subject:   Re: poor ethernet performance?
Message-ID:  <199907171529.IAA74679@apollo.backplane.com>
References:   <XFMail.990717113935.dmlb@computer.my.domain>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

:
:And you seen the nice square waves of 100Mb or !Gb ether on a line then? The
:techniques used for transmitting 100Mb/s down copper are certainly not digital.
:Pulse shaping, line estimation, ISI removal are all analogue!
:
:The cable itself is less improtant than the impedance matching at connectors
:and bends in the cable.
:
:Duncan
:
:Duncan Barclay          | God smiles upon the little children,
:dmlb@ragnet.demon.co.uk | the alcoholics, and the permanently stoned.

    Obviously you don't get square waves going down the wire - But it is
    still a digital communications protocol.

					-Matt



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907171529.IAA74679>