From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 19:59:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7AC3106566C for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 19:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp05.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp05.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.153.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384D98FC1D for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 19:59:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c83-255-51-20.bredband.comhem.se ([83.255.51.20]:54679 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp05.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RkLAW-0001QL-IP for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:46:14 +0100 Received: (qmail 3280 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2012 20:46:05 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 9 Jan 2012 20:46:05 +0100 Received: (qmail 99036 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Jan 2012 20:46:05 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 20:46:05 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Arnaud Lacombe Message-ID: <20120109194604.GA98975@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: <20120109143726.GA3185@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Originating-IP: 83.255.51.20 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1RkLAW-0001QL-IP. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp05.sth.basefarm.net 1RkLAW-0001QL-IP bdf488a712e451beaba5544bd8a25ad3 Cc: Mark Linimon , FreeBSD current mailing list Subject: Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:59:21 -0000 On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 01:16:59PM -0500, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: > >> On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > >> So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on > >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being "9.0 RELEASE" (with > >> checksum provided), in a `releases' directory, which are not actually > >> release images per-se ? > > > > Excellent! =A0You've shown the ability to understand flat, declarative, > > sentences that have no qualifying phrases. > > > FWIW, this was more a sarcastic sentence pointing out that FreeBSD is > currently officially distributing non-released build in a directory > which might leads users to consider this is the official release, thus > misleading them. That build is intended to become the official release unless some last-minute showstopper problem is found. (Unlikely, but has happened befor= e.) The build is being distributed in advance of the official announcement to make sure it is available on all mirrors at the moment the announcement is made. --=20 Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se