Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:36:07 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@gmail.com>, "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>, hackers@freebsd.org, Alexey Shuvaev <shuvaev@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de>, Nate Eldredge <nate@thatsmathematics.com> Subject: Re: genuine cpu I386_CPU kernel support Message-ID: <4ABBF457.8010000@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4ABA5937.9000406@elischer.org> References: <200909231554.n8NFsYwT078965@fire.js.berklix.net> <200909231209.08346.jhb@freebsd.org> <4ABA5937.9000406@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote: > I think a 386 can assume non-SMP in which case that can be simulated > just fine :-) > it also simplifies a lot of the other breakages.. > > #if (CPU == 80386) && defined(SMP) > #error "can't have smp on a 386" > #endif Paging Terry Lambert...Terry Lambert, to the hackers lounge please. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ABBF457.8010000>