Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 18:48:08 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 271225] net/dpdk-20.11: Update DPDK 20.11 to latest point release Message-ID: <bug-271225-7788-DuRzINMZw8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-271225-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-271225-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D271225 Robert Clausecker <fuz@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fuz@FreeBSD.org Status|New |In Progress Assignee|ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org |fuz@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Robert Clausecker <fuz@FreeBSD.org> --- Will commit with my next batch. Do you have a changelog for this update? As for the ONLY_FOR_ARCHS. Are you certain the port doesn't work on other architectures? The standard for setting this is if you know it won't work.= If you just haven't tested it, please leave this variable unset. You can disa= ble individual architectures with NOT_FOR_ARCHS and BROKEN_${ARCH} once they tu= rn out to not work. If everybody just submitted ports for the architectures t= he submitter tested, lesser used architectures would have no ports at all... I've just tested on aarch64 for example and found that it doesn't build, but the issue looks like it would be easy to fix: ../lib/librte_eal/arm/rte_cpuflags.c:86:9: error: unknown type name 'Elf64_auxv_t' typedef Elf64_auxv_t _Elfx_auxv_t; ^ (our ELF aux value code is slightly different from how Linux does it). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-271225-7788-DuRzINMZw8>