Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 8 May 2003 16:05:29 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Heiko Schaefer <hschaefer@fto.de>
To:        Mark Santcroos <marks@ripe.net>
Cc:        Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: data corruption with current (maybe sis chipset related?)
Message-ID:  <20030508155123.G78057@daneel.foundation.hs>
In-Reply-To: <20030508111807.GB1390@laptop.6bone.nl>
References:  <20030506162410.M66653@daneel.foundation.hs> <20030508111807.GB1390@laptop.6bone.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 07:16:32PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> > On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 04:41:30PM +0200, Heiko Schaefer wrote:
> > > does anyone know of any (freebsd-current) issues that might be causing
> > > this - or have any idea on how i can further rule out anything of this
> > > kind ?
> >
> > Try this in your kernel config:
> >
> > options		DISABLE_PSE
> > options		DISABLE_PG_G

ok. i have done my copying and checksumming orgy with these options in the
kernel - and it seems that i do not get any corruption anymore.
i will re-run my test once again now, just to be safe.

after that: does it make sense to single out which of the two options is
the relevant one ?

i'm also clueless what exactly these options do, and what exactly we've
ruled out now. could the lack of data-corruption just be some side-effect?

thanks, regards,

Heiko



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030508155123.G78057>