Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 13:35:03 +0930 From: Tim Aslat <tim@spyderweb.com.au> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make options (was Re: FreeBSD Port: mozilla-devel-1.4b) Message-ID: <20030624133503.25645629.tim@spyderweb.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20030624040023.GA30981@moo.holy.cow> References: <46462.63.104.35.130.1055950651.squirrel@email.polands.org> <1056122775.311.2.camel@gyros> <20030622170410.GC282@galgenberg.net> <200306232250.11318.x@Vex.Net> <20030624040023.GA30981@moo.holy.cow>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the immortal words of parv <parv_fm@emailgroups.net>... > Actually, i would prefer a Makefile.local for each port w/ all the > options commented out and/or default/normal options chosen & the > rest commented out. Of course, that would be most helpful when all > the ports take Makefile.local in account. (Well, it doesn't exactly > have to be "Makefile.local", it could be some other mechanism/file, > which deals only w/ various knobs/options.) I would prefer something more along the lines of the kernel config file, rather than the Makefile syntax. It's easily parsed and readily accessible. Cheers Tim -- Tim Aslat <tim@spyderweb.com.au> Spyderweb Consulting http://www.spyderweb.com.au P: 82243020 M: 0401088479
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030624133503.25645629.tim>