Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 01:44:16 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2 Message-ID: <201003030044.o230iGLF058596@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:37:33 PST." <4B86ED9D.6030306@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton wrote: > That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the > update needs to verify the diff between the two tarballs. > On 02/24/10 09:31, Wesley Shields wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:25:39PM +0300, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > >> On 24.02.2010 02:45, Wesley Shields wrote: > >>>> I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one > >>>> that matches the current distinfo file. So far no one has. > >>> > >>> I don't have one but QAT may. Hopefully itectu@ can confirm or deny > >>> that. > >>> > >>> -- WXS > >> > >> 4.2.1 was released. > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144258 > > > > I've grabbed this PR and will be committing it once I review it. > > I'm not going to suggest a course of action for you, but I would like to > say that for me I would still like to get a copy of the tarball that > matches what's in ports now to compare against the current version. But > I'm just paranoid like that. :) Pursuing diffs on re-rolled sources might be nice, but Doug, after you also refused to allow ports to flag installs of binaries not built from fetched sources ? ... Balance seems missing ! http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/ports/binary_installs.html Cheers, Julian - -- Julian Stacey: BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Mail plain text not quoted-printable, HTML or Base64 http://www.asciiribbon.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201003030044.o230iGLF058596>