Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 12:20:12 -0500 From: Derek Ragona <derek@computinginnovations.com> To: "Redd Vinylene" <reddvinylene@gmail.com>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND won't resolve my IPs (not upstream or something?) Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.2.20080809121205.024a1b50@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <f1019d520808090455k1788ee2epbccfd40f25e3f9b2@mail.gmail.co m> References: <f1019d520808090341m449a5b3fi7e0d6d2743b5efd@mail.gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080809064710.0250ee08@mail.computinginnovations.com> <f1019d520808090455k1788ee2epbccfd40f25e3f9b2@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 06:55 AM 8/9/2008, Redd Vinylene wrote: >I'm pretty sure I do, though my apologies if I'm wrong, did you check my >pastie? > >On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Derek Ragona ><derek@computinginnovations.com> wrote: > > At 05:41 AM 8/9/2008, Redd Vinylene wrote: > > > > I got this FreeBSD server called mother (80.252.2.2). On it, I've made > > two jails, camel (80.252.2.3) and box (80.252.2.4 through to > > 80.252.2.127). The problem is that reverse lookups for any of the IPs > > preceding .4 on box fails. If I connect to IRC with .5 for instance, > > it times out and reverts back to .4, whose lookup works just fine. > > BIND runs on camel. Maybe the problem is that BIND is not upstream for > > all those IPs? (I don't know what that means, a friend just told me) > > Or that I haven't configured the reverse for any of the other IPs? I > > would really like to keep BIND running on camel, as its dedicated to > > all my vital network services, whereas box is the home of all my > > users, and thus expendable ;) Is there any way to modify BIND on > > camel, or must I set up an additional one on box? My (hopefully) > > relevant configuration files can be found here -- > > http://pastie.org/250469 -- much obliged, and thanks! > > > > You need to check that you have zone files for both forward and reverse > > lookups, and those zones are defined in named.conf > > > > -Derek > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > Well, I never let my read of these files suffice. You should check them with the tools from bind: named-checkconf nemed-checkzone If they pass those tests, then check the resolution using just a single ip that is NOT jailed on this server using dig or nslookup. If those are working then adjust your jails. If you go step-by-step you will quickly get it working. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.0.22.2.20080809121205.024a1b50>