From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 00:13:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE1A16A41F for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:13:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719BB43D64 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:13:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-91-226-109.san.res.rr.com [66.91.226.109]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9K0DMmo022294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:13:22 -0700 X-MailKey: purple frogs are falling from the sky Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20051019170833.06230aa0@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:10:47 -0700 To: Chuck Swiger From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <4356DB52.9030800@mac.com> References: <20051019204428.GB46703@polands.org> <7BF2FC41-83C1-4E8C-8201-846783762B7B@mac.com> <4356CF56.2090106@gmail.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20051019161158.05ff9160@cobalt.antimatter.net> <4356DB52.9030800@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Doug Poland , kurt.buff@gmail.com, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing 2nd CPU on SMP board X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:13:23 -0000 At 04:48 PM 10/19/2005, Chuck Swiger wrote: >Glenn Dawson wrote: >>At 03:57 PM 10/19/2005, Kurt Buff wrote: >[ ... ] >>>>You want to get the same speed, FSB, and family number of Xeon, and it >>>>is preferable to get the same stepping number if possible. >>It's better to match the sSpec numbers...those include the >>stepping, and not all processors of the same stepping have the same sSpec. > >Intel's documentation for dual-proc and multiproc compatibility is >based on family ID and stepping #, not on the s-spec #. > >The family ID is akin to a major version number, and the stepping is >akin to a minor version number. You can get the family ID and >stepping from dmesg, you cannot get the sSpec number via that >directly. For example: > >CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz (2992.71-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf43 Stepping = 3 >Features=0xbfebfbff > Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs > >If you hunt down the right Xeon document: > >http://download.intel.com/design/Xeon/specupdt/30240216.pdf > >...and search for "0xf43", you get: The point I was trying to make is that if you use the sSpec number, you can't go wrong. 0xf43 leads to sSpec SL7ZF _and_ SL8ZQ -Glenn >S-Spec CoreStepping CPUID CoreFreq FSB L2_cache .... >SL7ZF N0 0F43h 3 800 2 MB 604-pin micro-PGA > >-- >-Chuck > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"