Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 09:46:01 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Porter's Handbook category violations Message-ID: <20000609094601.C45481@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20000608092518.B25567@argon.gryphonsoft.com>; from andrews@technologist.com on Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 09:25:18AM -0400 References: <20000601232048.K32212@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006080155130.26473-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000608092518.B25567@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 09:25:18AM -0400, Will Andrews wrote: > > > relay/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security > > > smbtcpdump/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security > > > sniffit/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security > > > socks5/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security > > > tcpshow/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security > > > telserv/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security > > > > I have no complaints with these. > > Okay. I'll take care of the CATEGORIES for the rest of them. Many of these are also My ports. Please do not touch them. I don't feel this has been fully discussed yet. As I mentioned there is a debate if Socks should be in 'net' or 'security'. Since people may look in either, I strongly feel it should remain in both. But it is not my port, so go convience the maintainer it is a good change. I also feel that people think of sniffers as both network diagnostic utils and as security (IDS) tools. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000609094601.C45481>