From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Apr 1 14:38:52 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA03034 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 14:38:52 -0800 Received: from feta.cisco.com (feta.cisco.com [171.69.1.158]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA03028 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 14:38:51 -0800 Received: from localhost.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by feta.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/CISCO.SERVER.1.1) with SMTP id OAA08680; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 14:33:57 -0800 Message-Id: <199504012233.OAA08680@feta.cisco.com> X-Authentication-Warning: feta.cisco.com: Host localhost.cisco.com didn't use HELO protocol To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com ("Rodney W. Grimes") Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Bind 4.9.3 beta 17 In-Reply-To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com's message of 31 Mar 1995 11:37:58 PST Date: Sat, 01 Apr 1995 14:33:56 -0800 From: Paul Traina Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Looks like we are at 4.9.3 BETA9 to me... Yes, however I've wanted to wait for 4.9 release to do the next BIND integration. I think the path I chose for 4.9.3-beta9 integration was a mistake. I spent a lot of time and effort breaking up the BIND distribution to be berkeley like, when all I succeeded in doing was making it more difficult to track. With 4.9.3-release, I was thinking of keeping the -entire- release (except for the libc stuff) under named with the subdirectory structure exactly matching the distribution. That way it is much easier to track future releases of BIND. Paul