From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 7 05:20:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E342D16A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 05:20:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from elsaurio.com.ar (200-32-4-157.prima.net.ar [200.32.4.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56C7743D39 for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 05:20:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from l0kit0@exactas.org) Received: (qmail 29899 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2004 05:19:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.exactas.org) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Nov 2004 05:19:25 -0000 Received: from 200.114.179.80 (SquirrelMail authenticated user l0kit0@exactas.org); by www.exactas.org with HTTP; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 02:19:25 -0300 (ART) Message-ID: <64168.200.114.179.80.1099804765.squirrel@www.exactas.org> Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 02:19:25 -0300 (ART) From: l0kit0@exactas.org To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: iptables under linux-emulation (debian?), can it be done? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 05:20:31 -0000 hi, im trying to get some use of the linux emulation :), ive got a debian box just for iptables tryouts (thats a waste of a machine:). i guess the best choice is to get it to work in my fbsd5 and play there, but, linux_base-debian y marked a broken some time now, should i expect it working soon?, i guess not for 5-stable :/ i prefer not to use redhat base, but if you say it is the only way, i would :(, now, can i play well with iptables on linux emulation? (it will be too complicated?). thanks in advance ps: maybe not the right list, but related to the mail topic: shouldnt be more practical to have /usr/ports//linux- under /usr/ports/linux// (i have it shadowed right now, and i found it more practical, what do you think?). (sorry for the bad english)