Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Feb 2003 00:12:40 -0600
From:      Redmond Militante <r-militante@northwestern.edu>
To:        Stephen Hilton <nospam@hiltonbsd.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: portsentry in combination with ipfilter
Message-ID:  <20030212061239.GB1381@darkpossum>
In-Reply-To: <20030211235530.376a5763.nospam@hiltonbsd.com>
References:  <20030212043806.GA1267@darkpossum> <3662.10.0.0.2.1045025758.squirrel@mail.karamazov.org> <20030212050509.GA1381@darkpossum> <20030211235530.376a5763.nospam@hiltonbsd.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

hi

thanks again.

i think i'm going to move portsentry to hosts behind the gateway - makes mo=
re sense considering the info you sent, and then look into snort/tripwire o=
n the gateway (i actually have tripwire installed, i just haven't generated=
 a new config db lately, since i've been messing around with my configs so =
much). =20

redmond

> Redmond Militante <r-militante@northwestern.edu> wrote:
>=20
> > hi
> > i've used portsentry on standalone workstations before with ipfilter se=
tup as a
> > +firewall, and for some reason, now when i'm trying to use it on a ipf/=
ipnat
> > +gateway box, it's being really verbose about the ports it's binding to=
.  if i
> > +nmap a standalone workstation i have configured ipfilter/portsentry on=
, i don't
> > +get the huge list of ports that it's binding to...  i thought perhaps =
there was
> > +a config option to hide this information
>=20
> Redmond,
>=20
> There is a good article regrading using portsentry @
>=20
> http://www.sans.org/rr/intrusion/portsentry.php
>=20
> They talk about version 1 on Linux being able to monitor ports=20
> using a socket instead of binding to a port, so this should=20
> look different to an nmap scan. As to wheather or not FreeBSD=20
> supports this feature, I do not know, Anyone out there chime in?
>=20
>=20
> >From the SANS article
> ----------------snip-----------------
> Example One ? Default configuration
>=20
> By default, the portsentry.conf is designed to listen and block=20
> attacking hosts using TCP Wrappers. The default configuration=20
> is set up to bind with some of the most commonly probed TCP ports=20
> and UDP ports on a Unix system. If any attacking host scans or=20
> makes an attempt to attach to one of the PortSentry bound ports,=20
> PortSentry will instantly drop the attacking host into the=20
> hosts.deny file, thus blocking _ALL_ traffic from the attacking=20
> IP address.=20
> ----------------snip-----------------
>=20
> What bothers me about this method of defense is the possibilty=20
> of an attacker causing a DOS by spoofing their source scan IP=20
> and causing your system to deny traffic from a vaild host like=20
> your upstream DNS server.
>=20
> I have not worked with portsentry at all so, this default=20
> behavior is probably not the optimum way to use this tool.
>=20
> Scanning is so common on the net that the gain from this=20
> seems minimal on a gateway firewall, inside your LAN is=20
> another story ;-)
>=20
> As to system integrity checking, I like to use Aide,=20
> found in /usr/ports/security/aide but tripwire is=20
> probably a more commonly used tool.
>=20
> Using a tight ipf firewall in conjunction with snort on=20
> a gateway firewall is a common and well liked setup.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Stephen Hilton
> nospam@hiltonbsd.com
>=20
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>=20

--H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+SeXXFNjun16SvHYRAigFAJ9kFpxEaR6bk+zBhXT4DpG9KTd9mgCfex1T
JkqykgOpQW/WbHSyJfhhDec=
=jJ78
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030212061239.GB1381>