From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 10:05:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9923416A4CE for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:05:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717C643D2D for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:05:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2HI526m095524; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:05:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2HI4rdx095523; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:04:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:04:53 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Garance A Drosihn Message-ID: <20040317180453.GD94853@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040317000232.GA52319@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: John Polstra cc: sparc64@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 64-bit time_t package build starting X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:05:04 -0000 On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 09:11:15PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 4:02 PM -0800 3/16/04, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >One of the sparc package machines deadlocked, so while rebuilding > >it I decided to update the machines to -CURRENT instead. It will > >be a few weeks before it finishes (slow HW), but in the meantime > >we can start to address any package problems it uncovers. > > Is there a schedule for getting some fix into the ezm3 port, > such as: > http://people.freebsd.org/~gad/time-64/port-ezm3.diff Why can't we just use __FreeBSD_version and avoid the extra stuff in the port? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)