Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:04:53 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: 64-bit time_t package build starting Message-ID: <20040317180453.GD94853@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <p06020411bc7d63d99ec9@[128.113.24.47]> References: <20040317000232.GA52319@xor.obsecurity.org> <p06020411bc7d63d99ec9@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 09:11:15PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 4:02 PM -0800 3/16/04, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >One of the sparc package machines deadlocked, so while rebuilding > >it I decided to update the machines to -CURRENT instead. It will > >be a few weeks before it finishes (slow HW), but in the meantime > >we can start to address any package problems it uncovers. > > Is there a schedule for getting some fix into the ezm3 port, > such as: > http://people.freebsd.org/~gad/time-64/port-ezm3.diff Why can't we just use __FreeBSD_version and avoid the extra stuff in the port? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040317180453.GD94853>