From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 6 21:23:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A22F106564A; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 21:23:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (ZIM.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279F18FC23; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 21:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n66KsAU0026013; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:54:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.3/8.14.2/Submit) id n66Ks9fL026012; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:54:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:54:09 -0400 From: David Schultz To: Bruce Simpson Message-ID: <20090706205409.GA25996@zim.MIT.EDU> Mail-Followup-To: Bruce Simpson , bde@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG, Alexander Churanov References: <4A5200CF.600@incunabulum.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A5200CF.600@incunabulum.net> Cc: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG, bde@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Boost.Math svn/branches/release regressions flagged X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:23:23 -0000 What architecture is this, and how new is the regression? On Mon, Jul 06, 2009, Bruce Simpson wrote: > Hi guys, > > Just doing a Boost regression run... Any ideas? 4 fails, in computing > float distance, over type double, with a large exponent. > > Details here: > http://www.boost.org/development/tests/release/developer/output/bms-freebsd-gcc-boost-bin-v2-libs-math-test-test_next-test-gcc-4-2-1-debug.html > > is linked off: > http://www.boost.org/development/tests/release/developer/math.html > See test_next link in left column of math.html, for affected code. > > All other failures in Boost.Math, including this one, are down to > lacking gmpfrxx, or lacking long double support in FreeBSD: > http://www.boost.org/development/tests/release/developer/output/bms-freebsd-gcc-boost-bin-v2-libs-math-test-test_tr1_long_double-test-gcc-4-2-1-debug-build-no.html > > This is not a prerequisite in the Boost port, and we don't package > gmpfrxx anywhere, so the concept checks fail. > > cheers, > BMS > > P.S. Boost has a fairly rich exposure to the platform, perhaps we can > get FreeBSD project resources for some occasional test coverage? > > P.P.S The IPv6 multicast failures in Boost.ASIO are due to the test > machine having no v6 addresses other than ::1 (and no candidate default > route). That's the module I'm most concerned with right at this moment.