From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 25 07:10:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A946716A4CE; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 07:10:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from itchy.rabson.org (mailgate.nlsystems.com [80.177.232.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE6043D1D; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 07:10:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from ns0.nlsystems.com (ns0.nlsystems.com [80.177.232.243]) by itchy.rabson.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7P79v7i069717; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:09:58 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) From: Doug Rabson To: Marcel Moolenaar Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:10:16 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200408231530.i7NFU5bu082414@repoman.freebsd.org> <200408240834.34656.dfr@nlsystems.com> <20040824195216.GA4444@ns1.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20040824195216.GA4444@ns1.xcllnt.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200408250810.16833.dfr@nlsystems.com> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on itchy.rabson.org X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1, clamav-milter version 0.75c on itchy.rabson.org X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen tls.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 07:10:03 -0000 On Tuesday 24 August 2004 20:52, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 08:34:34AM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > > > On ia64 we never call _rtld_allocate_tls(): > > *snip* > > > Interesting - do you have the previous change to gen/tls.c - the > > one which unbreaks static pthread-using binaries which don't have > > TLS sections? > > I don't know from the top of my head. I suspect I have, but there's > been too much going on that I can't recall everything I did. Let me > do a buildworld from HEAD first and then triage with or without the > various fixes. I'll get back to you... Thanks.