Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:27:41 +0300 From: Pavel Bychykhin <pavel.priv@hte.vl.net.ua> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some of ZFS ACLs doesn't work as expected Message-ID: <502FECAD.2030808@hte.vl.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <1800872199.811272.1345314287909.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <1800872199.811272.1345314287909.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
18.08.2012 21:24, Rick Macklem пишет: > Pavel Bychykhin wrote: >> Dear community! >> >> After my experiments with ZFS, I concluded, that permissions >> "delete_child" and "delete" are ignored. >> For the create/update/delete operation a list of "rwxp" >> (read_data/write_data/execute/append_data) is fully sufficient. >> >> No need to specify the "delete_child" and "delete" permissions at all, >> or I don't understand something? >> > I'm no acl expert, but I'm not sure anyone knows what "delete" means for > a POSIX fs that supports multiple hard links. Those ACL flags are in NFSv4 > to make them windows compatible. I checked the windows compatibility with help of SAMBA: "delete_child" and "delete" is really mapped to corresponding NTFS permissions. But this mapping was ignored when I tried to delete a file. I have no idea, why these two permissions supported by FreeBSD. May be, it's a simply non-working clone from Solaris, where it's permissions really works. > > Others will hopefully know more w.r.t. ZFS ACL specifics, rick > -- Best regards, Pavel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?502FECAD.2030808>