From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May  4 12:24:50 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130F337B401
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  4 May 2003 12:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from espresso.bsdmike.org (espresso.bsdmike.org [65.39.129.122])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9999D43FA3
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  4 May 2003 12:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mike@espresso.bsdmike.org)
Received: by espresso.bsdmike.org (Postfix, from userid 1002)
	id 038389C84; Sun,  4 May 2003 15:09:41 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 15:09:41 -0400
From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>
To: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@mail.ru>
Message-ID: <20030504150940.D55150@espresso.bsdmike.org>
References: <1052068880.617.9.camel@pav.oook.cz>
	<20030504145210.74ea557d.kabaev@mail.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030504145210.74ea557d.kabaev@mail.ru>;
	from kabaev@mail.ru on Sun, May 04, 2003 at 02:52:10PM -0400
Organization: The FreeBSD Project
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
Subject: Re: same define in two header files
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2003 19:24:50 -0000

Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@mail.ru> writes:
> On 04 May 2003 19:21:21 +0200
> Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz> wrote:
> >  Maybe there are stalled header files in /usr/include, how can I found
> >  which one? I can't rely on timestamps like with binaries.
> >
> No, this was a pollution I incorrectly propagated from non-i386
> platforms. I will commit a fix shortly.

I guess this means you're going to remove DBL_* and FLT_*?  If so, I
agree there's no reason why we should define duplicate constants in
a non-standard location.

Also, the namespace check for LONG_BIT and WORD_BIT is very dated and
forgets about any standards written in the last decade or so.  A more
appropriate check would be #ifndef __BSD_VISIBLE (after including
<sys/cdefs.h>).

Best regards,
Mike Barcroft