From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 8 11:55:10 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA06386 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 11:55:10 -0800 Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.20.4]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA06271; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 11:54:10 -0800 Received: by brasil.moneng.mei.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA13070; Wed, 8 Mar 95 13:51:45 CST From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <9503081951.AA13070@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Subject: Re: key exchange for rlogin/telnet services? To: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 1995 13:51:45 -0600 (CST) Cc: phk@ref.tfs.com, mark@grondar.za, barry@nacm.com, hackers@freefall.cdrom.com, security@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: <199503080603.IAA13529@grunt.grondar.za> from "Mark Murray" at Mar 8, 95 08:03:13 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4beta PL9] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 2094 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Because there wasn't one. > > What are the chances of "sanitising" a diff so I can track you work here? > I have some of the DES stuff available. 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa ^^^^^^^^^^^^ Something closely approximating zero, because I do not have a clue as to what is legal and/or allowable, and I don't really have the time to go figure it out. If somebody has a short, clear, and concise definition available of what is legal, I might reconsider. If another US resident would like to deal with this, *by* *all* *means* I would be willing to hand this over to that party. I am simply not interested in potentially violating some rather ugly (but senseless) laws and get tossed in some deep Federal dungeon somewhere.. > > Because of stupid governmental regulations, my offer is only open to folks > > whom I could legally hand a copy of DES to. Since I don't know the legal > > aspects any further than that, I am not interested in pursuing this any > > further than perhaps a cooperative cleanup effort of some sort. I don't have > > the time to try substituting a different type of encryption, making it work > > with the "exported" DES, et al. :-( Too many other fires under my butt > > right now. But I would be delighted to work on cleaning up the code, if > > someone else (particularly someone who has worked with the FreeBSD trees and > > is familiar with the 4.4 Makefile stuff/etc) is willing to help. > > I would certainly be interested in any _LEGAL_ diffs you could give me. I > do not mind re-creating work if that is what it takes. I didn't do anything very rocket-science'y with the DES stuff - basically a lift and switch with the original Kerberos stuff, as my memory has it. There was a lot of playing around to get it to compile up the clients, however, and if someone could clean it up, it could be cool... ... Joe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joe Greco - Systems Administrator jgreco@ns.sol.net Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwaukee, WI 414/342-4847