From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 18 23:54:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nix.dialup.com.au (nix.dialup.com.au [203.58.96.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B7414F63 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 23:53:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mynet@uq.net.au) Received: from uq.net.au (upstairs.dialup.com.au [203.58.96.30]) by nix.dialup.com.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA04855; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 16:48:44 +1000 Message-ID: <37BBA9C7.77BDC01@uq.net.au> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 16:52:55 +1000 From: Andrew X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sean-Paul Rees Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AMD PCnet 10/100 PCI usability References: <37BB59D0.72484081@dreamfire.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Check the cables and try a different hub. You may find that the problem isn't the PCnet chip. I have used a PCnet card before and it worked fine. Cheers Andrew Sean-Paul Rees wrote: > I have a PCnet 10/100 adapter built onto my motherboard (PC Server 325), > and FreeBSD picks it up as "lnc1." The damned thing got 3-4k/sec > transfers at the most. It appeared to not be negotiating with the hub > correctly. > > It looks like I'm going to need a second ethernet in that particular > machine to run NATD for a DSL. Is anybody getting decent performance > with that adapter in a similar configuration? I'd like to save $50. > > Cheers, > Sean > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message