Date: 07 May 2003 14:21:08 -0400 From: Adam <blueeskimo@gmx.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AFS Server and Client Message-ID: <1052331668.6547.44.camel@jake> In-Reply-To: <20030506222149.E19124@seekingfire.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0305061945510.30561-100000@server1.highperformance.net> <20030506222149.E19124@seekingfire.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-RqDTTF0skOxZX1s+vRtR Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2003-05-07 at 00:21, Tillman wrote: > Aside from features like volume management, failover, kerberos > authentication, ease of client maintenance and intelligent client-side > caching, you mean? ;-) >=20 > I'd /love/ to see the OpenAFS server in the ports tree - the last > messages on it that I've seen on various mailing lists seem to imply > that it's Real Close Now. After reading up on AFS, I'd agree that there are many promising features there. However, isn't NFS3 supposed to address some of these shortcomings?=20 Thanks for the education, --=20 Adam <blueeskimo@gmx.net> --=-RqDTTF0skOxZX1s+vRtR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+uU6Uu3o4GBMSDL4RAjcHAJ4jVnKWoM9g2Wu4UTv6Fa9HM5DtSgCfbKLN LZQCwaBhx1niVlczzPIihTk= =Cg/7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-RqDTTF0skOxZX1s+vRtR--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1052331668.6547.44.camel>