From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 29 22:25:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CDE106566B for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:25:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.145.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653088FC0C for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:25:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (bennett@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9TMPIHu027509; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:25:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:25:18 -0500 (CDT) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <200910292225.n9TMPIWU027508@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: bf1783@googlemail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: math/arpack patch.tar.gz timestamp differs between ports and freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:25:24 -0000 On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:41:37 +0000 "b. f." wrote: >>=> patch.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/arpack. >>=> Attempting to fetch from http://www.caam.rice.edu/software/ARPACK/SRC/. >>fetch: patch.tar.gz: local modification time does not match remote > >rm -v /usr/ports/distfiles/arpack/patch.tar.gz and start again. > Well, well. I took the message shown above to the effect that that file didn't exist there at face value. But the file was indeed there, so I guess portmaster or something that portmaster runs can lie. After manually deleting the file per your suggestion, math/arpack installed just fine. Thank you very much! math/octave is now compiling as I write this. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * **********************************************************************