From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Oct 15 11:02:08 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA24633 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 15 Oct 1996 11:02:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.109.160]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA24628 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 1996 11:02:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id NAA26208; Tue, 15 Oct 1996 13:01:12 -0500 From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <199610151801.NAA26208@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Subject: Re: /sbin/init permission To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 13:01:11 -0500 (CDT) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, j@uriah.heep.sax.de In-Reply-To: <199610151752.DAA18137@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Oct 16, 96 03:52:05 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >PLEASE DO NOT MAKE THIS EXECUTABLE BY 'other'. It is very possible to > >bring a system to its knees if there is even a moderate amount of UUCP > >work by doing > > > >while true; do > > /usr/libexec/uucp/uuxqt& > >done > > Is this much different from any other fork bomb? Yes, it is an I/O bomb. It is not much different than while true; do du -s / & sleep 2 done > >You probably do not want to run uuxqt if you have a NFS mounted /usr because > >you probably have a NFS mounted /var and Taylor himself says not to run > >UUCP on a NFS mounted partition due to locking problems. > > Well, I have an nfs-mounted /usr, a ufs /var, and don't normally run uucp :-). :-) ... JG