From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jan 11 6:41:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F081C37B419 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 06:41:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from dwcjr (dwcjr [192.168.0.216]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEEF319A98; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:41:08 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <001c01c19aae$01086940$d800a8c0@inethouston.net> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Alan E" , "Joe Marcus Clarke" Cc: "FreeBSD ports list" References: <20020111021009.A77067@shumai.marcuscom.com> <200201111429.g0BETOe35486@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> Subject: Re: ports/33777: samba WITH_CUPS pulls in cups meta-port, not cups-base Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:41:07 -0600 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > On Friday 11 January 2002 02:10, you wrote: > > I think this is a mistake. Samba needs the CUPS printing binaries to > > do printing. When you configure Samba for CUPS printing, it > > automatically sets the printing variables to point to the CUPS lp > > > > I think you are right. Although, that being the case, WTF is it linking > against libcups? > > Well, I guess my change needs to be backed out pending investigation of how > and why this samba + cups printing works. > > Damn. (Problem is, anything that can pull in cups-lpr gets somebody ticked > off 'cause it messes up their printing. Oh well...) > As soon as someone can tell me it works or it doesn't instead of "I think", I'll be glad to change this ot leave it alone for good. I guess not that many people use CUPS. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message