From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon May  8 13:58:24 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8996E37BC5D
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon,  8 May 2000 13:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA45657;
	Mon, 8 May 2000 14:58:17 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA79868; Mon, 8 May 2000 14:58:02 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <200005082058.OAA79868@harmony.village.org>
To: Duncan Barclay <dmlb@ragnet.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Getting an aligned IO port 
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 08 May 2000 21:53:48 BST."
		<XFMail.000508215348.dmlb@computer.my.domain> 
References: <XFMail.000508215348.dmlb@computer.my.domain>  
Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 14:58:01 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <XFMail.000508215348.dmlb@computer.my.domain> Duncan Barclay writes:
: So does re-allocating a resource clear the allocation for the old range?

Which also means that in the res != NULL case the code I posted was
bogus.  You have to do a bus_release_resource(dev, res); on it.

Now, where did I put the patches for resource allocation alignment
restrictions.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message