From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Nov 26 11:36:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from assurance.rstcorp.com (assurance.rstcorp.com [216.112.242.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897A415B72 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 11:36:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vshah@rstcorp.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by assurance.rstcorp.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA04170; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 14:37:52 -0500 Received: from proxy.rstcorp.com(216.112.242.5) by assurance.rstcorp.com via smap (V2.0) id xma004165; Fri, 26 Nov 99 19:37:35 GMT Received: from jabberwock.rstcorp.com (jabberwock.rstcorp.com [192.168.2.98]) by sandbox.rstcorp.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA07528; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 14:33:52 -0500 (EST) Received: by jabberwock.rstcorp.com (Postfix, from userid 93) id 4EBC15AD3; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 14:36:11 -0500 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14398.57642.861319.487652@jabberwock.rstcorp.com> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 14:36:10 -0500 (EST) From: "Viren R.Shah" To: Scott Donovan Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Seagate Backup Exec for Linux? In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.19991126162208.00cd4880@imap.tassie.net.au> References: <14393.40502.584798.911817@jabberwock.rstcorp.com> <4.2.2.19991126162208.00cd4880@imap.tassie.net.au> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: "Viren R.Shah" X-Face: )~y+U*K:yzjz{q<5lzpI_SVef'U.])9g[C9`1N@]u3,MHY7f*l7C)[_NjM4y4K8$uIUh|\u (K&&HS6,M!61&GMTk'mqmB/Qg]]X}"?TzsFl]"2v!bl8']dma.:^IY^a[lbOI>U:b<~FyK3q-p{HmZ mn~g.`~BE!5{2D:}Yi+\_KkWe?XaHj9$ko1k8iKLYv5*_2c8"G=?Up[}hn+7RNM(bzBZ_wWk6!Pf&B ?3Tcm7M7B~W%K/I0aX3]*=jP?aM]H6HBPT`oLk+0n^_;N\2\%|Rhy;p}34Q.jEsM\qtnxcm;ag%Nq Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >>>>> "Scott" == Scott Donovan writes: >> Has anyone gotten the "Seagate Backup Exec Agent" for Linux working on >> a -stable system? We are curently trying to get this to run, and it Scott> Yep We have it working on of all things 3.2-Release, doesn't Scott> seem to behave on 3.3-Release though. Unfortunantely we didn;t Scott> do anything amazing, just hacked the install script to think Scott> it was linux, branded the binary as a Linux Binary and off it Scott> went. (Version 7.3 BTW) Scott> Perhaps something changed between 3.2-release and 3.2-stable Scott> in the emulation ? Well, I just looked thru my log file, and saw: Nov 22 13:58:14 jabberwock last message repeated 51 times Nov 22 13:58:15 jabberwock /kernel: linux: syscall ustat is obsoleted or not implemented (pid=35198) Does anyone know whether the emulation of ustat was removed form the linux compatibility code? Viren -- Viren R. Shah, viren @ rstcorp . com, http://www.rstcorp.com/~vshah/ If you understand what you're doing, you are not learning anything To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message