From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 18 11:55:40 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1331065672;
	Tue, 18 May 2010 11:55:40 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org)
Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.50.215])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1998FC0A;
	Tue, 18 May 2010 11:55:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 2C6105C37; Tue, 18 May 2010 07:56:11 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 07:56:11 -0400
From: Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org>
To: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20100518115611.GA45921@atarininja.org>
References: <86hbm5yjjh.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <86hbm5yjjh.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: preferred place for system-wide config files
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:55:40 -0000

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 07:29:22AM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
> a little confusion arised from ports/146627.
> 
> The Porter's Handbook defines PREFIX as the place where port should
> install its files including config files. However, it doesn't say where
> the port should try to read its config files that may not exist:
> LOCALBASE/etc or PREFIX/etc? Until recently I assumed such files as
> installed together with the port unless they belong to some other port.
> 
> For example, many GNU_CONFIGURE ports look for config files under
> SYSCONFDIR that's usually under PREFIX/etc and some of them don't
> install config files nor samples. A few examples: xorg-server,
> subversion, git. Should such ports be modified to use LOCALBASE/etc?

PREFIX/etc is the correct place. Very few ports touch LOCALBASE at all,
and when they do it's explicitly requested. I'm thinking of bind here as
an example.

-- WXS