From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 27 13:37:18 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 372A916A417; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:37:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2452013C461; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:37:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from zion.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1011A4D7E; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:37:17 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:26:44 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <554518.24927.qm@web45614.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <554518.24927.qm@web45614.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711270826.44847.jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Juri Mianovich , Robert Watson Subject: Re: peak mbuf stat missing ... and needed ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:37:18 -0000 On Monday 26 November 2007 03:52:13 pm Juri Mianovich wrote: > > --- Robert Watson wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Juri Mianovich wrote: > > > > > I am sorry to repost, but I cannot get any answer > > on this from -net or > > > -questions ... is there any answer to getting this > > stat ? (see below) > > > Thank you for your explanation. > > Since my main goal in all of this is to find out when, > and if, I am maxing out mbufs, can you confirm to me > that if one or both of these lines: > > 1393/3255452/3253717 requests for mbufs denied > (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) > 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k) > > have non-zero numbers, then I can be sure that I am > indeed running out of mbufs ? Yes. -- John Baldwin