From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 25 09:14:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F29116A402 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:14:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC8313C457 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:14:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from coolf89ea26645 (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id l0P9EPx97389; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:14:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Message-ID: <008801c74061$05982190$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "George Vanev" , References: <000901c73fb4$200bb5d0$0200000a@Vanev><000a01c7405a$593a0f40$0200000a@Vanev> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:13:04 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP Embedded SATA RAID controller (FreeBSD 6.2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:14:32 -0000 Hold on there. HP makes SCSI and SATA versions of many of their servers, the model numbers are almost identical between them. I think the only difference in the servers is the SCSI ones have an additional card. Now, before you go any further on Windows drivers you got to understand something. Win XP came out before SATA and Microsquash never put in the primitives to support the higher SATA speeds in XP. So in order to get faster speed you gotta write your Windows driver to look like a SCSI miniport driver. MS also don't certify SATA for WCHL so if you are selling SATA raid chipsets and you want to slap their filthy WCHL certification sticker on your product box, once more you got to write your driver to look like a SCSI driver. You take a very serious risk whenever you compare features of windows drivers and FreeBSD drivers and attempt to draw conclusions on hardware. Ted ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "George Vanev" Cc: Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:58 AM Subject: Re: HP Embedded SATA RAID controller (FreeBSD 6.2) > George Vanev wrote: > > > AHA-3985 is SCSI controller. The one I have is SATA. > > Yes, I'm sure that it's Adaptec, but what is the model?! > > If FreeBSD didn't recognised it during the installation > > does that mean that it is incompatible with FreeBSD? > > Yes, I understand that AHA-3985 is SCSI HostRAID and that you've SATA one. > But look at the driver for your SATA RAID for Windows. You can find in > driver's files both 'SATA'/'Serial ATA' and 'SCSI' words. There is > definitely 'AHA3985' string in .sys file for Windows. Maybe it was remade > for SATA. Probably FreeBSD hasn't working driver for this SATA HostRAID > now. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >