From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 08:30:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9178579A; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 376B0341; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CAE40066; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:30:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id B3A8840064; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:30:56 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bernadotte.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 Received: from mx.daemonic.se (mx.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 822234005F; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:30:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3flg8t1QM2z8gh6; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:30:54 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mx.daemonic.se ([10.1.0.3]) (using TLS with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA) by mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [10.1.0.6]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTPS id SfjurCJgqBi3; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:30:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::4]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3flg8h4SNZz8gh4; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:30:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (tifa.daemonic.se [10.32.0.6]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3flg8h3z0gz9CvV; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:30:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by tifa.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8F522831; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:30:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5322BE33.4070003@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:30:43 +0100 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Weinberger Subject: Re: svn commit: r348113 - head/graphics/libEGL References: <201403131835.s2DIZS7s028667@svn.freebsd.org> <5321FC4C.9070503@freebsd.org> <5322008C.6010600@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" , Antoine Brodin , David Chisnall , "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" , "ports-committers@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:30:58 -0000 On 03/14/14 03:57, Adam Weinberger wrote: > On 13 Mar 2014, at 21:12, David Chisnall wrote: > >> On 14 Mar 2014, at 04:01, Niclas Zeising wrote: >> >>> 5 days is not nearly enough time to call maintainer timeout, regardless >>> of how small the fix seem to be. >> >> 5 days does seem long enough for the maintainer to say 'thanks, I will >> review this'. Communication is important, even when it's just to say >> 'I don't have time for this now, but we are working on it...' > > I might be the only person here who does not have a job where I'm able > to use the internet, but I am only able to handle FreeBSD stuff on my > days off. I recognize that the situation under discussion involved a > security-related issue, and I would agree that committing a > security-related PATCH deserves a very short window. Beyond that, I urge > you to consider that not all of us are able to read home email at work, > much less respond to it. > As far as I know, this was not a security related issue. It was a bug in a ports makefile in a piece of xorg that is not used/installed by default. Regards! -- Niclas Zeising