From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 4 22:32:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC5E1065673; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 22:32:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04FAD8FC16; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 22:31:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id AAA00821; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:31:58 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1RXKbF-000I8R-SP; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:31:57 +0200 Message-ID: <4EDBF4DD.3030001@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:31:57 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111108 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Attilio Rao References: <20111113083215.GV50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <201112011349.50502.jhb@freebsd.org> <4ED7E6B0.30400@FreeBSD.org> <201112011553.34432.jhb@freebsd.org> <4ED7F4BC.3080206@FreeBSD.org> <4ED855E6.20207@FreeBSD.org> <4ED8A306.9020801@FreeBSD.org> <4ED8F1C1.7010206@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Konstantin Belousov , John Baldwin Subject: Re: Stop scheduler on panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 22:32:01 -0000 on 02/12/2011 19:18 Attilio Rao said the following: > BTW, I'm waiting for the details to settle (including the patch we > have been discussing internally about binding to CPU0 during ACPI > shutdown) I do not see strong interdependency between that patch and the panic patch. BTW, I think that your patch is good to go. > before to read the whole thread and start a proper review, > would it be possible to have an almost-final version of the patch? It is still the same patch that Kostik posted a few weeks ago. I think that it is long overdue to be committed. -- Andriy Gapon