Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:50:24 GMT From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/76750: Fix wording about what version of FreeBSD PF can be used in. Message-ID: <200501271250.j0RCoOLF061524@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/76750; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: Brad Davis <so14k@so14k.com> Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/76750: Fix wording about what version of FreeBSD PF can be used in. Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:45:02 +0200 On 2005-01-27 04:59, Brad Davis <so14k@so14k.com> wrote: > - <para>For older 5.X version of &os; you can find > - <acronym>PF</acronym> in the &os; ports collection here: > + <para>For versions of &os; younger than 5.0 and older than 5.3 you > + can find <acronym>PF</acronym> in the &os; ports collection here: > <filename role="package">security/pf</filename>.</para> pf(9) is, AFAIK, included as part of the base system in releases `older than 5.3'. So the correction is not 100% true. > + <para><acronym>PF</acronym> is not avaliable for &os; 4.</para> Typo: s/avaliable/available/.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200501271250.j0RCoOLF061524>