From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 23:30:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E51416A485 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 23:30:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C028A13C48A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 23:30:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l55NUB29033496 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 23:30:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l55NUBMe033493; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 23:30:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 23:30:11 GMT Message-Id: <200706052330.l55NUBMe033493@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Michael Scheidell" Cc: Subject: Re: ports/112522: mail/Razor-agents has performance problem with SpamAssassin X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Scheidell List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 23:30:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/112522; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Michael Scheidell" To: Cc: Subject: Re: ports/112522: mail/Razor-agents has performance problem with SpamAssassin Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 19:23:49 -0400 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0002_01C7A7A7.0B4B4DD0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Any problem with this patch? as the official maintainer of p5-Mail-SpamAssassin, I found a huge = performance increase with these well documented, well tested patches. for background, see this bug report on spamassassin bugtraq: http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3D5312 We have been using these patches in two dozen production systems for = almost a month. ------=_NextPart_000_0002_01C7A7A7.0B4B4DD0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Any problem with this = patch?
 
as the official maintainer of = p5-Mail-SpamAssassin,=20 I found a huge performance increase with these well documented, well = tested=20 patches.
 
for background, see this bug report on = spamassassin=20 bugtraq:
 
htt= p://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3D5312
 
We have been using these patches in two = dozen=20 production systems for almost a month.
 
------=_NextPart_000_0002_01C7A7A7.0B4B4DD0--