From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 3 05:48:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D1116A410 for ; Wed, 3 May 2006 05:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F1C43D4C for ; Wed, 3 May 2006 05:48:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-242.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.242]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCC34D410; Wed, 3 May 2006 07:59:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340905285C; Wed, 3 May 2006 07:47:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44584421.3000807@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 07:48:17 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20060502193900.GA94069@peter.osted.lan> <1541458526.20060503003229@merdin.com> <20060502221306.GD95348@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060502221306.GD95348@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stress testing the UFS2 filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 05:48:16 -0000 Kris Kennaway schrieb: > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 12:32:29AM +0400, Pavel Merdine wrote: >>Of course I think we could do patches to overcome corrupting panics, >>but the core FreeBSD team would not accept this, as they are happy >>with panics and corruptions they make to other filesystems. > > Of course not, don't make silly accusations :-) > > The problem is much more difficult to solve than "making the panic an > error return". I'm interested in more information about this issue. Do you have a reference to an old discussion about this topic or do you like to explain it a little bit further for me (and probably others)? Thanks in advance Björn :-)