From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 9 12:11:20 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA27264 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 9 Oct 1998 12:11:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA27213 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 1998 12:11:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from randy@rip.psg.com) Received: (from randy@localhost) by rip.psg.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA12445; Fri, 9 Oct 1998 12:11:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from randy) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 12:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199810091911.MAA12445@rip.psg.com> From: Randy Bush MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Studded Cc: Marc Gutschner , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is 'xntpd' broken in -stable? References: <361DEC25.30065DCC@Triplan.COM> <361E3DE4.39F057F4@gorean.org> <199810091757.KAA10402@rip.psg.com> <361E4FE8.2EF1B5DA@gorean.org> <199810091845.LAA11689@rip.psg.com> <361E5F28.1DE06387@gorean.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> xntpd gives me the analogous message. i am at security level 2. > Well that's probably it then. :) i.e. one can not run ntp at security level 2? should i like this? randy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message