Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:07:51 +0200
From:      Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Comments on pmake diffs for building on Linux
Message-ID:  <20080304160750.GC95950@kobe.laptop>
In-Reply-To: <20080304154339.L41184@fledge.watson.org>
References:  <20080303.224256.635730757.imp@bsdimp.com> <20080304151326.J41184@fledge.watson.org> <20080304153730.GA61036@kobe.laptop> <20080304154339.L41184@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2008-03-04 15:45, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> The next part, about the missing errx() functions on Solaris is going to
>> be tonight's fun.  If there are too many missing functions, it may be
>> worth adding a static `libcompat' with copies of just the functions we
>> need to run BSD make on non-BSD hosts.
>
> It's beginning to sound like it would be really nice to have an
> autoconf'd/automake'd version of our make to drop onto Linux, Solaris,
> etc, etc, systems in order to bootstrap our compile.

Thanks :)

> I share Warner's reluctance to add autoconf parts to our native build,
> but having 'bsdmake' as a starting point is useful, and would put
> those other platforms more at parity with Mac OS X as a starting point
> (probably ahead due to more accessible native build tools).  I'm a bit
> surprised there isn't already a Linux 'bsdmake' package floating
> around...

There's always `pmake', and the `bmake' that NetBSD uses to bootstrap
itself using their `build.sh' script and a POSIX shell, but there are a
couple of details which may inhibit these from being useful for
bootstrapping FreeBSD.

The `pmake' package of Linux distributions[1] is based on NetBSD make
sources.  While NetBSD make is probably 90% of what we need to bootstrap
FreeBSD, it's still *not* FreeBSD make :/

[1] http://packages.debian.org/etch/pmake

> (When I say 'nice' above, I mean it in the normal autoconf sense of the
> word 'nice', so don't take that the wrong way!)

I lost you there.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080304160750.GC95950>