From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 13 06:39:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA05111 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 13 Dec 1998 06:39:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id GAA05105 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 1998 06:39:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id NAA00456; Sun, 13 Dec 1998 13:29:07 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199812131229.NAA00456@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: ESS1868 patches To: brian@Awfulhak.org (Brian Somers) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 13:29:06 +0100 (MET) Cc: brian@Awfulhak.org, sanpei@sanpei.org, luigi@iet.unipi.it, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199812122203.WAA08065@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> from "Brian Somers" at Dec 12, 98 10:03:08 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The other patches (http://www.jp.freebsd.org/~sanpei/pcm0-ESS.tar.gz) > seem to be for 2.2 only :-/ I run -current on my laptop, so I can't > test them. i think they will apply with a minimal effort. Apart from the select/poll differences and one ioctl argument (which should not involve these patches), the whole "pcm" driver is exactly the same for 2.2 and 3.0 > Anyone have any other ESS1868 they'd like me to test ? Should I try > the xperiment stuff ? the one in xperiment is the same as the above URL i think. luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message