Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 7 May 1996 01:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:      asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
To:        chuckr@Glue.umd.edu
Cc:        FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Tcl75/tk41
Message-ID:  <199605070847.BAA02514@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960506223328.17156A-100000@ginger.eng.umd.edu> (message from Chuck Robey on Mon, 6 May 1996 22:38:19 -0400 (EDT))

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 * Maybe it's time to consider tossing the other tcl versions we've 
 * accumulated in ports, and rename things to tcl/tk again.  At least, I'd 
 * like to hear some comments from anyone else who's experimented with stuff.

No, we are not going to do this.  The only renaming, if anything,
would be tcl/tk -> tcl73/tk36.

We have learned our lesson, and it is: if we have a port that is
depended from a lot of other ports, and the authors do not preserve
backward compatibility, we can't have only one version of it.

I doesn't make sense to rename tcl75/tk41 to tcl/tk; when tcl76/tk42
come out, we'll have to do the same thing all over again.

Satoshi



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605070847.BAA02514>