From nobody Mon Jan 24 18:08:55 2022 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABDD198F663 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 18:08:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JjHzt22jWz4bww; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 18:08:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1643047738; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xqCHzC1oVTEbFiwt/JGhPJ5nEsDwlPc1ZNB87fNcMa0=; b=ImFDGneY4WEqj8OkMzQ0KIQPv3PW5CEKYFodWPMCWsrDBEjkEHjAMFTb1sXoV6ypCSv0QR A93zx+MOdCmIi1xr0kLBt6x5wMkyywND1VxKT4Jp6SjWfiHUC+XCLak/g/heghN8RZYdVg GWXda2yfPhQNRHCHwdAYS3IoawWLdir4UjxFnHn3itqb0o3Se6R7aUhaEh+/0xJi4UvEo+ GmLie33klleFcjxyncCtzVWESWT/v1Unimo4esufxSLhib8FDoSqs3fXve0BB420MDF1Ay IwEDAab/68oIUAzARvjNneZ4Xi7Ox/wT14e08sF8YANH6hugZK+fExPes79HzQ== Received: from aniel.nours.eu (nours.eu [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:3a4d::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB203F82; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 18:08:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by aniel.nours.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 09A8C4C2CA; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:08:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:08:55 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Chris Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg Message-ID: <20220124180855.ts7hctbh47xmspxk@aniel.nours.eu> References: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1643047738; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xqCHzC1oVTEbFiwt/JGhPJ5nEsDwlPc1ZNB87fNcMa0=; b=BTNls1AGVmyU3A0TjpDpO8J0ATFmhFGHzboN2LdArgV5isGGildgP98ekpV+g8LCIUzBx/ GX3ENNSgA87nr7UbAVA9DkRIN+xSq9AXGOLFevXRfhTj2LLD0JTbreZQ1A89ZO8s2mmOvo I6SHKk0Bp+L6Bp0cgntkPEdooa4FzTp4Zl37d4qwZxHsK4TRX995KcVfNBrNB9e6ksYI+H cgL1Z7K+Ofii31QzLXNbRuwCMP7ppfJIpZKrQmo0gYu5uhb6aS9pbO0JcJhnSqgx6ur2s/ 55nlQoaaH4h//+vyd2NTrL/mhEiZRk6tXT8pqgQOBxIZ5RAS+Q0MrDwadOjLSg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1643047738; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=iI4UbC6MBhP0zY5vTX/MVNOTGK7HMQv5k2+u5Hd9xIH/DfhBDgbFQCl5mjs4nVEhFCALC6 egPGw+HY69S61G12oY0mAa+rfKLhMSKhF4GPu/L60SbROKYLng98ducALOBemzsW6UoZ2J CAXLNmtYegvFmrD/j12RhoIlU33JYLwNEGtj5bCv4ihWO7IwgmqDK6bk/noToEVBcVDI/1 taVY1Fsq4xCrZ7nKfOLIkxD3VOjuua9tTfKEY6UzhzqAimceTj1Rrc8mxklU8a3Y3OL0CG cguhqr/553VqUerppIiyqpbgsaWkJ3ArNgnNP89daHIW3daolwN3wY5L0J3FwA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:29:45AM -0800, Chris wrote: > On 2022-01-24 03:00, Daniel Engberg wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just wanted to chime in on Alexander's (netchild@) mail and I fully agree. > > Looking at base we already have a lot of contrib and since we need to > > adapt each > > software project to our build framework a lot tends to get dated quickly and > > currently is so I don't see the benefit importing more at all. I would > > also like > > to highly advice against importing software which is considered dead > > upstream, > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thttpd . > > > > If anything, something like https://github.com/emikulic/darkhttpd or > > similar which > > would be very easy to maintain and is active > > FWIW I'd also like to vote +1 on NO additions. I only vote in favor of ftp > in this > thread because we have a million year... OK 30 plus years of track record > for it and > it just works. Tho I must admit I find @bapt's recent tcp proposal an > interesting and > appealing idea. :-) The proposal is now in anyway ;) I am just struggling on the name of the scheme: tcp:// or pkg+tcp:// (with a rename of ssh into pkg+ssh:// :D) Best regards, Bapt