From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 11:10:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D741ABC3162 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCBFE18B6 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BC2AABC3160; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAD5BC315F; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) Received: from uucp.dinoex.sub.de (uucp.dinoex.sub.de [IPv6:2001:1440:5001:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "uucp.dinoex.sub.de", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D09918B5; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:10:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) Received: from uucp.dinoex.sub.de (uucp.dinoex.sub.de [194.45.71.2]) by uucp.dinoex.sub.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u7NBA02G061468 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:10:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) Received: from bamd10.dinoex.sub.de (dinoex@localhost) by uucp.dinoex.sub.de (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) with BSMTP id u7NBA0KP061454; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:10:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) To: chrcoluk@gmail.com (Chris), ports@freebsd.org, ports-secteam@freebsd.org Message-ID: From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) Organization: privat Subject: Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:09:48 +0200 X-Mailer: Dinoex 1.79 References: <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> <6d35459045985929d061f3c6cca85efe@imap.brnrd.eu> <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> X-Gateway: ZCONNECT bamd10.dinoex.sub.de [UNIX/Connect 0.94] X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 16 EC 0A D3 3A 4F 28 8A 8A 47 93 F1 CF 2F 12 X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 2001 by Dirk Meyer -- All rights reserved. X-PGP-Key-Avail: mailto:pgp-public-keys@keys.de.pgp.net Subject:GET 0x331CDA5D X-ZC-VIA: 20160823000000S+2@dinoex.sub.org X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: uucp.dinoex.sub.de; Sender-ip: 194.45.71.2; Sender-helo: uucp.dinoex.sub.de; ) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (uucp.dinoex.sub.de [194.45.71.2]); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:10:01 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:10:09 -0000 > I am excited about opensl 1.1 but I am not sure if it is right to just > jump the security/openssl port to it, maybe make a new > security/openssl11 port? > > Or move the default port but add a new security/openssl10 port for 1.0.2. this would only increase the mess we have, and create only more conflicts between libssl.so versions. We have done this for openssl 0.9x before, not with good results. kind regards Dirk - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany - [dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org],[dirk.meyer@guug.de],[dinoex@FreeBSD.org]