From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jun 21 17:17:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A7514E60 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 17:17:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from bubble.didi.com (sji-ca4-28.ix.netcom.com [205.186.212.156]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA43362; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 17:17:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by bubble.didi.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id RAA05446; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 17:17:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 17:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199906220017.RAA05446@bubble.didi.com> X-Authentication-Warning: bubble.didi.com: asami set sender to asami@cs.berkeley.edu using -f To: handy@lambic.physics.montana.edu Cc: ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: (message from Brian Handy on Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:10:34 -0600 (MDT)) Subject: Re: Nuke netscape-*-4.51 From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) References: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Brian Handy * Since the distfiles are gone, I vote to nuke: * * netscape45-navigator * netscape45-communicator Weren't there some issues on reliability with 4.6? If those are resolved, I have no objections against removing the 4.5* versions. -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message