From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 18:36:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568BA16A4CE; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 18:36:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.jazztel.es (smtp2.jazztel.es [62.14.3.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761B943D4C; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 18:36:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from antivirus by smtp2.jazztel.es with antivirus id 1CbNio-0007oY-00 Mon, 06 Dec 2004 19:36:30 +0100 Received: from [212.106.236.196] (helo=rguez.homeunix.net) by smtp2.jazztel.es with esmtp id 1CbNio-0007oL-00 Mon, 06 Dec 2004 19:36:30 +0100 Received: from redesjm.local (orion.redesjm.local [192.168.254.16]) by rguez.homeunix.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iB6IaUkf002520; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:36:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@redesjm.local) Received: by redesjm.local (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iB6IabV4001471; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:36:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@redesjm.local) From: Jose M Rodriguez To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:36:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <41B40C97.7000102@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <41B40C97.7000102@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200412061936.35851.freebsd@redesjm.local> X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1; AVE: 6.28.0.19; VDF: 6.28.0.106; host: antares.redesjm.local) X-Virus-Scanned: by antivirus cc: Rob cc: freebsd-current Subject: Re: names of supfiles in /usr/share/examples/cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 18:36:34 -0000 El Lunes, 6 de Diciembre de 2004 08:39, Rob escribi=F3: > Hi, > > For 5.3 in /usr/share/examples/cvsup, there's: > > stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-stable > standard-supfile : for FreeBSD-current > > I find this naming rather confusing. Why "stable" refers to STABLE, > but "standard" refers to CURRENT ? > > This causes unnecessary confusion. Why not the following name > convention: > > release-supfile : for FreeBSD-RELEASE Better security-supfile. There is just one release, things like=20 RELENG_5_3 are security branchs, not release branchs. > stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-STABLE > current-supfile : for FreeBSD-CURRENT > =2D- josemi