From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jan 22 1:47:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from clove.rp.lan (unknown [212.74.15.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7694137B400; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 01:47:11 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dom@localhost) by clove.rp.lan (8.9.3/8.8.7) id JAA08793; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 09:46:47 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: clove.rp.lan: dom set sender to dom@semantico.com using -f Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 09:46:47 +0000 From: Dominic Mitchell To: Roelof Osinga Cc: Bjoern Fischer , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: PAM (was: Re: MAIL set by whom?) Message-ID: <20010122094647.A7853@semantico.com> References: <3A6A50F3.307C9E06@nisser.com> <20010121103324.A297@frolic.no-support.loc> <3A6B042E.659C716D@nisser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3us In-Reply-To: <3A6B042E.659C716D@nisser.com> X-Warning: Incoming message from The Big Giant Head! X-OS: Linux 2.2.13 i686 X-Uptime: 9:36am up 24 days, 20:56, 3 users, load average: 1.24, 0.72, 0.29 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 04:45:50PM +0100, Roelof Osinga wrote: > Grand gesture. Laudable even. Yeah, that PAM sure seems to've > become popular. The Courier IMAP port also insisted upon its > installation. Insisted in that fiddling with the makefile only > resulted in failure to configure. But that's a whole different > story. Would it be a good idea to start using /etc/pam.d ala RedHat, instead of the monolithic /etc/pam.conf? As far as I can see the support is already there, it's just not being used due to the presence of the /etc/pam.conf. This would make installing PAM entries far easier for the ports. -Dom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message